 |
NOW AND THEN
CONSPIRACY TO OBSTRUCT JUSTICE
On behalf of my mother\'s memory, it is extremely crucial to expose the truth about the heinous treatment, perpetrated with malice intent, against my mother and myself at the hands of doctors, bureaucrats, and civil servants, who completely ignored our constitutional rights. It demonstrates how any of us can be victimized by the healthcare system, primarily due to the arrogance of doctors, who not only violate our civil rights, but also ignore our basic dignity as human beings. The definite truth of the matter is that we quite literally become hostage to the system without any recourse.
On April 3, 1991, the injustice started when a doctor, who did not even specialize in my mother\'s condition, insisted vehemently that I sign a consent form, that would enable him to perform bypass surgery and when I requested a second opinion, he became extremely enraged. It was then that he was very guilty for intentionally documenting the outrageous slander and the most incriminating allegations, based solely on total falsehood. Whoever was contacted ignored the doctor\'s letter dated October 1, 1992 that indicated the confirmed fact that \"There is no evidence that prior amputation (as has been suggested by her prior physician) would have benefited the patient without incurring significant additional risk to her health.\" It was also inconceivable for an agency to intentionally falsify their report dated May 2, 1994 for the sole purpose of distorting the truth to suppress this investigation by indicating that, \"at no time were the slanderous allegations against me documented,\" although the doctor\'s medical report indicated that it did, dated April 3, 1991. This most malicious doctor, who wanted to remain anonymous was actually the one to unlawfully and deceitfully initiate this criminal case and whose name was then excluded from an agency whose corrupt report was also known to be most falsified and ludicrous in every way, shape, or form.
The agency\'s most falsified and ludicrous report dated June 17, 1992, indicated that, \"No Physicians Will Treat [My Mother] due to [my] behavior, [naming two hospitals],\" confirming that according to their report the agency was known to be totally responsible for collaborating with the perpetrators to have the slanderous allegations continue for the sole purpose of making the agency\'s case more credible, but taking this most despicable action was incredible. This heinous crime was created in the most underhanded and conniving manner by the agencies who conspired with the numerous doctors, hospital administrators, and home care agencies to continue the most unspeakable slander, specifically to justify their unlawful mandate and that started the repetitious chain of a series of events. It was then that the perpetrators unlawfully mandated my mother\'s medical care that caused her condition to be constantly jeopardized until her tragic passing on Monday, May 10, 1993.
The agency’s unlawful mandate was confirmed by an attorney whose written statement dated March 10, 1993 indicated that the agency did not investigate this case. This mere fact proved that the agency intentionally and unlawfully mandated my mother\'s medical care while knowing that there were never, ever any solid proof or evidence that supports any basis for it. The agency was also guilty for their intentional criminal action due to their report dated 9/14/91 that confirmed the invasion of privacy which indicated that \"a search of banks in the area of {my mother\'s} home has been instituted.\" \"To date nothing has been located.\"
Despite all of my constant efforts to have this criminal case discontinued through all avenues imaginable, this case still continued to be ongoing in a very repetitious and consecutive manner. The perpetrators were known to be underhanded for their most malicious way they kept preventing each and every of my desperate attempts to receive the help that was needed that proved to be why my efforts were all in vain that confirms my reports dated 10/15/92 and 6/16/93.
On May 17, 1991, I received a written statement from a patient, who was with my mother in the same hospital room, where she indicated how my mother\'s condition was being totally ignored, neglected and jeopardized. Because of my mother being constantly mistreated I submitted her x-rays on May 16, 1991 to a doctor, whose evaluation confirmed that she had a serious infection. The doctor then informed me that he would arrange for my mother to be transferred and admitted to a hospital, where he would treat her condition but instead, my mother\'s doctor rejected the transfer and on May 18, 1991, discharged her from a hospital without having any follow-up care or home care, when knowing that the medical report dated 4/10/91 indicated that my mother had pneumonia.
It was also inconceivable that when my mother was discharged from a hospital she was denied home care but instead she was referred to \"physicians on call\" that confirms the medical record dated July 9, 1992. The medical record dated April 20, 1993 also indicated that if needed my mother \"could go to the emergency room anytime\". It was then that my mother had to go to the emergency room on April 27, 1993 due to the physician on call refusing to take responsibility to remove the band-aid that was left on her toe when she was discharged from the hospital. Apparently the continuation of this ongoing injustice was contributed to my mother\'s tragic passing that was inevitable on Monday May 10, 1993.
It was also inconceivable that I was unable to receive the Home Care Agency\'s letter, dated February 19, 1992 that the hospital social worker requested. This most incredulous letter was extremely difficult to obtain from whomever I contacted, until I contacted the hospital administrator, who was the one that finally sent me the letter dated April 7, 1992. Otherwise, I would not have known that my mother was refused the Home Care services due to the most slanderous and incriminating allegations that were indicated in the letter, dated February 19, 1992.
It was also inconceivable to receive the Patient Representative\'s letter dated May 13, 1992, which indicated that a doctor, who specialized in my mother\'s condition refused to see her. I also received the Center for Nursing\'s letter, dated July 13, 1992, which indicated, that on June 29, 1992, my request for the home health care program for my mother was denied, due to the hospital social worker informing the Intake Coordinator to reject her from their program. Soon after, I received another letter, dated August 5, 1992, which indicated the confirmed fact that my mother was refused once again the home health care services. The facts also confirm of the relentless way my mother needlessly suffered the overwhelming consequences by having to endure this terribly agonizing ordeal, repeatedly inflicted in the most malicious and heinous manner imaginable until my mother was unable to survive.
On May 5, 1992, the agency that I contacted referred this criminal case to a Deputy Commissioner, whose thorough investigation determined that the case proved to be fabricated, based solely on total falsehood and deception, thereby the case was dropped and closed that confirmed their written report dated May 29, 1992.
On June 10, 1992, the injustice was still allowed to continue due to my mother being mistreated by the hospital administration who ignored the agency\'s discontinued mandate dated May 29, 1992. The injustice continued on July 10, 1992 when my mother was discharged in the most jeopardizing manner by refusing her the prescription for medication and the follow-up care. The medical record also indicated and confirms that after my mother was bedridden for several weeks, she was taken directly from the hospital by ambulette service to a doctor\'s office, where the doctor also refused to prescribe the essential medication. It was then that I had to call numerous times to contact the hospital administration, until the important prescription was finally called in to the pharmacist.
On October 22, 1992, this unthinkable dilemma continued to repeat itself when my mother had to leave a doctor\'s office in pain, due to the doctor refusing to see her that confirms his written statement, dated 10/22/92. An attorney\'s written statement, dated 1/22/93 also indicated that, \"a doctor was telephoned for an appointment, but he did not want to see my mother.\" There were also the doctors who accepted my mother\'s insurance but refused to see her unless I paid them that confirms my cancelled checks. I also received a letter from an ambulette service dated 8/6/92 indicating that a cardiologist refused to authorize the transportation for my mother when knowing that she was entitled to it. This jeopardizing situation continued repetitiously, consecutively, and relentlessly until it destroyed our lives.
On May 4, 1993, the injustice continued to repeat itself due to my mother who was still being once again totally mistreated by the hospital administration when knowing about the discontinued mandate referring to May 5, 1992 and who also intentionally ignored the judge\'s report dated 4/28/93 that also indicated the discontinued mandate.
This most unthinkable and unspeakable injustice caused me to be totally devastated when knowing the way my mother\'s condition was being jeopardized repeatedly in the most malicious and heinous manner imaginable from the time this criminal case originated on April 3, 1991 until it contributed to my mother\'s tragic passing that was inevitable on Monday, May 10, 1993. Even though the perpetrators unlawful mandate was discontinued on May 29,1992 and also on April 28,1993 the perpetrators were still allowed to continue this most unthinkable and unspeakable injustice by also preventing me from helping my mother, who I loved with all of my heart and soul, and the deepest hurt that I feel will always remain within every fiber of my being that will last forever.
After my mother\'s tragic passing, it became very obvious that I am now as before forced to be involved with an ongoing case that is connected and related to circumstances that are similar and repetitious. The facts confirm of the relentless way that I still continue to be once again a \"Victim of Circumstances\"!
On April 23, 1980 I contacted a dentist, whose damaged bridge procedure that he performed was confirmed by a dentist, whose written statement indicated to \"go to an attorney for malpractice and negligence\". Once again, I had another damaged procedure performed by a dentist whose written statement dated April 16, 1996 indicated that he would \"re-prepare tooth number #2 for a replacement gold onlay crown at no additional fee\" but he then breached his agreement.
On August 12, 1996, I had the damaged crown on tooth #2 removed by a dentist, who I did not remember seeing him in 1980. But an attorney\'s letter dated 7/17/80 confirmed that this was the very same dentist who in the most deceitful manner discouraged the attorney from taking my malpractice case that occurred on April 23, 1980. It is a confirmed, known fact that this dentist was also very guilty when he unlawfully committed fraud by accepting my eight hundred and sixty dollars with no intention of completing the procedure that he started on tooth #2, while also knowing that every dentist that I contact would refuse to continue where he left off and that started the repetitious chain of a series of events.
On October 31, 1996, I contacted a doctor who after calling the dentist about the incomplete procedure, she then became guilty for her falsified report that indicated the most vicious slanderous allegations against me and whose deceitful actions confirmed her attorney\'s letter that I received dated March 1, 2000.
On October 24, 1996, the doctor from the hospital emergency room referred me to the dental clinic, where a dentist also refused to complete the procedure on tooth #2 that was started on August 12, 1996. This most jeopardizing situation kept continuing to be ongoing until it resulted in my having on 5/22/06 tooth #2 and tooth #3 extracted. Several letters dated 6/8/06, 8/6/06 and 8/23/06 indicated and confirmed that once again the dentist still denied me treatment when knowing that I have an infection.
On Thursday, April 24, 1997, I had no other alternative but to go, again, to the hospital emergency room, where I was informed, that a dentist would treat the infection on tooth #2, but instead I continued being once again totally ignored by the dentist who refused to see me or refer me. It was then that I contacted the hospital administrator, who assured me that he would inform the Patient Representative to resolve the urgency of this ongoing dilemma.
On Friday, April 25, 1997, this ongoing dilemma continued, referring to April 24, 1997, due to the Patient Representative who was with two psychiatrists who confronted me in the most harassing manner, when knowing that I had a dental infection and that the \"suicidal\" allegation that they documented was most deceiving and ludicrous.
On Saturday, April 26, 1997, this dilemma repeated itself when I had to go again to the hospital emergency room where I was informed that I would be seen by a dentist on call, but after being kept waiting he then refused to see me. At that precise moment, I became seriously ill and I was informed that my blood pressure was dangerously high (210/120) and my EKG was abnormal, which was all due to this most outrageous and overwhelming ordeal, that I was forced to endure. It was then that the President of the hospital refused to respond to the letter that I sent him dated November 10, 1997 regarding this most unthinkable jeopardizing situation.
On May 12, 1997, I contacted an endodontist who breached his agreement by not completing the root canal on tooth #2. He also breached his agreement by totally refusing to refer me to a dentist to perform the crown and post.
On June 16, 1997, the dentist, who I contacted, refused to consult with the endodontist about the incomplete root canal on tooth #2. He also caused me to have a problem by refusing to grant me an appointment when knowing that the damaged crown procedure that he performed on tooth #2 has to be removed. This fact confirmed the written statement dated 4/4/01 which indicated that \"the crown on tooth #2 is short with evidence of decay underneath an open margin and on the surface it has been patched with composites.\" The dentist who also caused me to have a problem confirms his written statement dated 8/10/00 indicating that tooth \"#3 has a temporary crown that is not protected and leaky\" which he refused to rectify and soon after I was informed that my dental membership was cancelled on 8/17/00 that confirms the cancelled checks that were returned to me. Whoever was contacted informed me that they refuse to continue where the dentist left off because it is solely the dentist\'s responsibility to rectify their damaged procedure. This dilemma continues to be ongoing due to the various dentists who intentionally were causing my condition to be once again totally neglected repeatedly in the very same malicious way as it was previously indicated, referring to 10/24/96. Several of the dentists who were summonsed to court for mediation, refused to appear to confront the truth of matter, but instead a letter dated March 23,1997 was sent to the mediation which indicated the most vicious slander against me.
On May 16, 1997, after having an electric and echo cardiogram a cardiologist refused to grant me another appointment, even though she informed me that my blood pressure was dangerously high. Her letter, dated 9/17/97, indicated that she refused to submit the results of the cardiograms to a dentist who requested it on 7/30/97. But the dentist then also refused to see me, even though I received the normal test results from two other cardiologists. It was also inconceivable that after having the echo cardiograms taken on 12/31/03, 11/1/04 and on 11/17/04 each of the three cardiologists, including the primary doctor, who was the one to refer me, and who also refused to grant me another appointment in regard to their decision based on the findings of the tests. I then had to contact other cardiologists whose written statements indicated that a \"full assessment could not properly be made due to it being of poor quality\". Due to this mere fact an accurate decision was not determined as to whether or not I need to be pre-medicated for the dental procedure that was urgently needed and long overdue that proves to be a repetitious occurrence referring to May 16, 1997. The agency that had jurisdiction to oversee this ongoing injustice refused to respond to the numerous reports that they received regarding it. This jeopardizing situation that occurred prior still continues to be an ongoing repetitious pattern of the malicious way that I am being mistreated by the various doctors, dentists and the agencies who refuse to oversee this most corrupt injustice that constitutes this mere fact to be the ultimate crime in itself.
On August 22, 1997, I sent certified letters to several agencies, and each and every time after that, the agencies kept constantly ignoring, disregarding, and overlooking the numerous reports, which indicated the confirmed known fact that I still continue to be, once again, as I was previously the \"Victim of Circumstances\"! It was also inconceivable to receive the agency\'s letter dated 1/28/99, that was based on deception which indicated that I should submit the x-rays, otherwise the case will be concluded, while knowing that I signed several authorizations on 10/15/97 for the release of all dental records. The agencies also continued to prove to be guilty as they did previously, for refusing to oversee this ongoing injustice for the obvious reason that they could not dispute or refute the truth of the matter in any way, shape, or form. Whoever was contacted totally ignored each and every aspect of this criminal case from the time it first started on 4/23/80 until at this present time that constitutes this mere fact to be the ultimate travesty and a mockery of justice.
From April 23, 1980 through September 25, 2006, I sent certified letters to the various doctors, dentists, agencies, and legal services to confirm for the record of the repetitious and relentless way that I am being refused their help. The facts all confirm that this was a matter of injustice for my mother and myself to be the ones persecuted repeatedly by the system that we tried to get help from and the perpetrators who were totally responsible and guilty for intentionally instituting this criminal case were the ones protected, condoned, and vindicated. Apparently the system is known to protect its own, that constitutes this mere fact to be the ultimate travesty and a mockery of justice in every way, shape or form.
It is also a confirmed known fact that after being a union member in good standing for twenty eight years, the union\'s president and also their chief dentist refused to respond to the truth of the matter as to why they intentionally caused me to be mistreated and victimized. The union was also known to continue the injustice by totally ignoring their attorney\'s most heinous action at the time she was informed about the doctor\'s slanderous report against me dated April 3, 1991. It was then that she became very guilty in the most repetitious way for vehemently documenting the very same outrageous slander with malice intent that confirmed her falsified report dated March 21, 1994. The union also ignored the fact that on January 27, 1982, due to a co-op scam, my employer gave me permission to see his attorney and also to have someone cover my station at a hotel, where I worked for seventeen years. I had no other choice but to call the individual who refused to admit that the attorney she recommended gave me a ludicrous attorney search, dated January 13, 1982 which indicated that \"we have not run judgment and liens against said fee owners, since I will be subject to any liens, etc. against the fee owner.\" Due to this co-op scam I cancelled my contract and lost my deposit of four thousand three hundred dollars and the owners sued me for sixty thousand dollars. It was also inconceivable that my employer who took over the concession in March of 1981, granted me permission to see his attorney on January 27, 1982 and when I introduced him to the individual who covered my station for ninety minutes, he then fired me the very next day on January 28, 1982. He was also guilty when he gave me my vacation check that bounced. Because of this injustice I had to file a claim for my employer to appear at small claims court, but instead a processor was there to serve me a summons of fifteen thousand dollars for malicious prosecution. It was then that my unemployment checks were denied and I also had to file an appeal with the unemployment appeal board, where I won my case when the judge rendered his decision in my favor based on the injustice that occurred and also based on my employer\'s recommendation letter, dated November 4, 1981. Due to this mere fact, the union totally ignored the judge\'s favorable justified decision and it was then that the union intentionally and knowingly rendered their decision to be totally corrupt, deceiving and most ludicrous that can never ever be disputed or refuted in any way, shape, or form.
The fact remains that a total of 331 certified receipts from the numerous letters and reports that were sent to the various places, but whoever was contacted kept disregarding their responsibilities and obligations by refusing to oversee this criminal case. The bottom line is that I continue to be a \"victim of circumstances\" that confirms this travesty of justice still continues to be an ongoing \"Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice\"!
|
